We Need a Federal "No More Inbreeding" Amendment
Say what you will about the FMA's chances of ever getting passed, you do have to admit that President Bush's endorsement of it have caused the wingnuts to really show their nuttier side.
A couple of quick examples:
1. Here's Jerry Falwell with A Call to Scotchguard Marriage :
If this simple but powerful amendment becomes law, it would permanently protect traditional marriage from activist judges and politically correct activists from ever achieving their goal of attaining homosexual marriage rights. The traditions of our Founders would be secured.
Yes, their traditions like wooden teeth, outhouses, and slavery would be secured forever and ever.
Christians must be prepared to fearlessly (and immediately!) invade the culture with the Gospel of Christ to counter the godless effort to bring radical social change to our nation. This effort has no end because these social extremists will never be satisfied; if they achieve homosexual marriage there is literally no telling what they will want next
There is indeed literally no telling what they will want next, because those close-mouthed godless radical gay social extremists just aren't saying. But we can guess: they'll probably want homosexual wedding showers and gay divorce. Oh, and to eat Christian babies.
The issue goes far deeper than homosexual marriage, though. Homosexual-rights advocates are on a relentless quest to gain governmental and social endorsement of their lifestyle(s). And our children are their targets!
See, I told you they wanted to eat our children! And you'll notice that some of them are so depraved that they have more than one lifestyle. Be careful: some of these bi-lifestylers might be in YOUR neighborhood. Be especially wary of the evangalist/hateful bigot. They can be nasty when cornered.
2. And now let's let Armstrong Williams order around the VP's daughter in Dance, Mary, Dance:
One moment gay and lesbian protesters are demanding that we regard them not by their insipid sexual acts, but as complex human beings deserving of the same inalienable rights the constitution reserves for all "humans." The next moment they are labeling and dismissing any human who breaks ranks with their cause.
Damn gays! They want us to treat them like humans, and then they go and set up a website asking "the openly gay daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney" to support their cause. And this means that we DON'T have to treat them like humans.
Oh, and Armstrong wants you to know that his sexual acts are bold and flavorful.
Get it? Mary doesn't act as gay as they feel she should so they label and dismiss her. How neat and easy and ridiculously absurd. I mean, isn't this precisely the sort of reductive stereotyping that the homosexual activists are supposed to be fighting against? I mean, isn't that their thing? Respecting a human beings freedom to make intimate decisions without heaps of third-party indignation and scorn?
Yeah, they're supposed to respect people and stuff, and yet they treat Mary like a homosexual! The hypocrites! Thank heavens that we never claimed to respect anybody, and so can bash people without compunction.
After all, why do gay couples want the church's blessing? They could go about their business just fine without having been "wed" in a church, right? Unless there is more to it. It is political, and often economic.
Whoa, Armstrong has figured out those inscrutable gays! It seems that they aren't trying to force Catholic priests to marry them after all! No, they want the economic and legal benefits that come with civil marriage. The sneaks!
But if you look behind the rhetoric about civil rights, it becomes clear that they are acting at the expense of what is best for society, and to grant them victory, would be to rip our most sacred religious and cultural ideals to shreds. This no one owes them!
Why do gays hate America and its most sacred religious and cultural ideals?